論我國取保候?qū)徶贫鹊耐晟?rar
論我國取保候?qū)徶贫鹊耐晟?1.69萬字26頁包括開題報告，任務(wù)書，封面，完整論文，文獻(xiàn)綜述等整套完整畢業(yè)資料!摘要針對我國取保候?qū)徶贫却嬖诘闹T多不足之處，我們有必要引進(jìn)英國的保釋制度。英國的保釋制度作為一項刑事訴訟制度，在保障犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的人身自由權(quán)利，保證訴訟程序的正常進(jìn)行等方面發(fā)揮著重要作用。本文擬就保釋制度與...
該文檔為壓縮文件,包含的文件列表如下:
內(nèi)容介紹
原文檔由會員 lyy1314 發(fā)布
論我國取保候?qū)徶贫鹊耐晟?br>1.69萬字 26頁
包括開題報告，任務(wù)書，封面，完整論文，文獻(xiàn)綜述等整套完整畢業(yè)資料!
摘要
針對我國取保候?qū)徶贫却嬖诘闹T多不足之處，我們有必要引進(jìn)英國的保釋制度。英國的保釋制度作為一項刑事訴訟制度，在保障犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的人身自由權(quán)利，保證訴訟程序的正常進(jìn)行等方面發(fā)揮著重要作用。本文擬就保釋制度與我國的取保候?qū)徶贫冗M(jìn)行比較研究，以便能完善我國的取保候?qū)徶贫龋瑱?quán)當(dāng)拋磚引玉。
本文正文分四個部分。第一部分論述取保候?qū)徳谖覈默F(xiàn)狀。包括取保候?qū)徳谖覈陌l(fā)展現(xiàn)狀和取保候?qū)彺嬖诘膯栴}。第二部分對英國保釋制度進(jìn)行考察?？疾靸?nèi)容包括英國保釋制度的歷史演進(jìn)、英國保釋制度的基本內(nèi)容及英國保釋制度的理念基礎(chǔ)。第三部分將我國的取保候?qū)徟c英國的保釋制度進(jìn)行比較。為借鑒英國保釋制度完善我國取保候?qū)徸麂亯|。第四部分筆者就如何借鑒英國保釋制度，完善我國取保候?qū)徶贫冗M(jìn)行論述。筆者先對我國取保候?qū)徃母镞M(jìn)行宏觀的思考，在轉(zhuǎn)變訴訟觀念的前提下將取保候?qū)彽男再|(zhì)從強制措施的權(quán)力性質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)楸Ｕ先藱?quán)的權(quán)利性質(zhì)；然后筆者對我國取保候?qū)徃母镞M(jìn)行了微觀的思考，具體從五方面來借鑒英國的保釋制度，完善我國的取保候?qū)徶贫?，使之與我國建設(shè)現(xiàn)代法治國家的目標(biāo)相適應(yīng)。
關(guān)鍵詞：取保候?qū)彛ａ?，完?
On the Improvement of the System of Posting a Bail and Awaiting Trial with Restricted Liberty of Moving in China
Abstract
As the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving has something inadequate, it is necessary for us to recommend bail system used in England. The bail system in England, as a system of administrative lawsuit, plays an indispensable role in guaranteeing suspect, defendant’s personal freedom rights, and guaranteeing the normal process of judicial proceeding, etc. This paper focuses on the comparison between the bail system and the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving in China. In such a way, the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving will be more perfect. It is just like a volunteer to give an opinion so that others may follow suit.
There are four parts in body of the paper. In the first part, the author introduces the present situation on the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving in China, including its development and problem at present. In the second part, the author makes an investigation of the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving in England, including the development of its history, the basic content of it, and the idea basis of it. In the third part, a comparison on the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving is made between China and England, which makes a preparation to the next part. In the fourth part, the author discusses the way how to improve the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving in China by drawing on the experience of bail system in England. It will be discussed from two aspects in the following: On the one hand, the author thinks deeply on the improvement of the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving from a macroscopic perspective. In the basis of transforming lawsuit concept, the author aims to transform the nature of the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving from mandatory measures to the guarantee of human rights. On the other hand, the author thinks deeply on the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving from a microcosmic perspective. The improvement on the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving in China, which benefits by England’s experience, is revealed in five aspects in detail, so that the system will be adaptable to the goal of China’s establishment of a modern country with perfect law.
Keywords：Bail system，Bail out，Perfect
目 錄
目 錄 I
摘 要 Ⅲ
Abstract Ⅳ
前 言 1
一、取保候?qū)徳谖覈默F(xiàn)狀 2
（一）取保候?qū)徳谖覈陌l(fā)展 2
（二）取保候?qū)彺嬖诘膯栴} 2
二、英國保釋制度的考察 6
（一）英國保釋制度的歷史演進(jìn) 6
（二）英國保釋制度的基本內(nèi)容 8
1.保釋的適用范圍 8
2.保釋的保證形式 8
3.保釋的決定主體 9
4.違反保釋規(guī)定的法律責(zé)任 9
5.保釋的救濟(jì)程序 10
（三）英國保釋制度的理論基礎(chǔ) 10
1.自由理念 10
2.無罪推定 11
三、取保候?qū)徟c保釋制度的比較 12
（一）取保候?qū)徟c保釋制度的相似之處 12
（二）取保候?qū)徟c保釋制度的不同之處 12
四、借鑒保釋制度，完善取保候?qū)?15
（一）取保候?qū)徃母锏暮暧^思考 15
（二）取保候?qū)徃母锏奈⒂^思考 16
1.適用范圍方面 16
2.保證形式方面 16
3.決定權(quán)方面 17
4.制裁舉措方面 17
5.救濟(jì)程序方面 18
結(jié) 論 19
參考文獻(xiàn) 20
致 謝 21
參考文獻(xiàn)
[1]徐靜村.刑事訴訟法學(xué)（第三版）（上）[M].北京：法律出版社，2008.
[2]林兆波，王硯圖.取保候?qū)徶贫却嬖诘娜毕莺统雎穂A].見陳衛(wèi)東.保釋制度與取保[M].北京:中國檢察出版社，2009.
[3]林苗.權(quán)力腐敗與權(quán)力制約[M].北京：法律出版社，1998.
[4]邱小梅.有關(guān)保釋制度的一點思考[D].載于陳衛(wèi)東.保釋制度與取保候?qū)?北京：中國檢察出版社，2003.
[5]任寰.關(guān)于在我國刑事訴訟中建立司法審查制度的構(gòu)想[J].法學(xué)，2003(5).
[6]李佑安,安永勇.取保候?qū)徟c保釋制度比較研究[J].載于陳衛(wèi)東.保釋制度與取保候?qū)?北京：中國檢察出版社，2003.
[7]栗克元.刑事訴訟法學(xué)[M].河南：鄭州大學(xué)出版社，2004.
[8]陳衛(wèi)東.保釋制度與取保候?qū)廩M].北京：中國檢察出版社，2003.
[9]張建良.刑事強制措施要論[M].北京：中國人民公安大學(xué)，2005.
[10]陳光中.外國刑事訴訟程序比較研究[M].北京：法律出版社，1988.
[11][英]L•B•科爾森.朗文法律詞典[M].（英文版）.北京：法律出版社，2003.
[12][英]P•H•科林.英漢雙解法律詞典[M].（英文版）.世界圖書出版公司，1998.
[13]周振想.論金錢保釋制度[J].中外法學(xué)，1994(3).
[14]徐靜村,潘金貴.論英國保釋制度及其借鑒意義[J].政治與法律，2004(1).
[15]房國賓,邱俊芳,齊玥.兩大法系保釋制度比較研究及我國保釋制度的立法和構(gòu)建[J].法學(xué)研究(甘肅社會科學(xué))，2005(4).
包括開題報告，任務(wù)書，封面，完整論文，文獻(xiàn)綜述等整套完整畢業(yè)資料!
摘要
針對我國取保候?qū)徶贫却嬖诘闹T多不足之處，我們有必要引進(jìn)英國的保釋制度。英國的保釋制度作為一項刑事訴訟制度，在保障犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的人身自由權(quán)利，保證訴訟程序的正常進(jìn)行等方面發(fā)揮著重要作用。本文擬就保釋制度與我國的取保候?qū)徶贫冗M(jìn)行比較研究，以便能完善我國的取保候?qū)徶贫龋瑱?quán)當(dāng)拋磚引玉。
本文正文分四個部分。第一部分論述取保候?qū)徳谖覈默F(xiàn)狀。包括取保候?qū)徳谖覈陌l(fā)展現(xiàn)狀和取保候?qū)彺嬖诘膯栴}。第二部分對英國保釋制度進(jìn)行考察?？疾靸?nèi)容包括英國保釋制度的歷史演進(jìn)、英國保釋制度的基本內(nèi)容及英國保釋制度的理念基礎(chǔ)。第三部分將我國的取保候?qū)徟c英國的保釋制度進(jìn)行比較。為借鑒英國保釋制度完善我國取保候?qū)徸麂亯|。第四部分筆者就如何借鑒英國保釋制度，完善我國取保候?qū)徶贫冗M(jìn)行論述。筆者先對我國取保候?qū)徃母镞M(jìn)行宏觀的思考，在轉(zhuǎn)變訴訟觀念的前提下將取保候?qū)彽男再|(zhì)從強制措施的權(quán)力性質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)楸Ｕ先藱?quán)的權(quán)利性質(zhì)；然后筆者對我國取保候?qū)徃母镞M(jìn)行了微觀的思考，具體從五方面來借鑒英國的保釋制度，完善我國的取保候?qū)徶贫?，使之與我國建設(shè)現(xiàn)代法治國家的目標(biāo)相適應(yīng)。
關(guān)鍵詞：取保候?qū)彛ａ?，完?
On the Improvement of the System of Posting a Bail and Awaiting Trial with Restricted Liberty of Moving in China
Abstract
As the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving has something inadequate, it is necessary for us to recommend bail system used in England. The bail system in England, as a system of administrative lawsuit, plays an indispensable role in guaranteeing suspect, defendant’s personal freedom rights, and guaranteeing the normal process of judicial proceeding, etc. This paper focuses on the comparison between the bail system and the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving in China. In such a way, the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving will be more perfect. It is just like a volunteer to give an opinion so that others may follow suit.
There are four parts in body of the paper. In the first part, the author introduces the present situation on the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving in China, including its development and problem at present. In the second part, the author makes an investigation of the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving in England, including the development of its history, the basic content of it, and the idea basis of it. In the third part, a comparison on the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving is made between China and England, which makes a preparation to the next part. In the fourth part, the author discusses the way how to improve the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving in China by drawing on the experience of bail system in England. It will be discussed from two aspects in the following: On the one hand, the author thinks deeply on the improvement of the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving from a macroscopic perspective. In the basis of transforming lawsuit concept, the author aims to transform the nature of the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving from mandatory measures to the guarantee of human rights. On the other hand, the author thinks deeply on the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving from a microcosmic perspective. The improvement on the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving in China, which benefits by England’s experience, is revealed in five aspects in detail, so that the system will be adaptable to the goal of China’s establishment of a modern country with perfect law.
Keywords：Bail system，Bail out，Perfect
目 錄
目 錄 I
摘 要 Ⅲ
Abstract Ⅳ
前 言 1
一、取保候?qū)徳谖覈默F(xiàn)狀 2
（一）取保候?qū)徳谖覈陌l(fā)展 2
（二）取保候?qū)彺嬖诘膯栴} 2
二、英國保釋制度的考察 6
（一）英國保釋制度的歷史演進(jìn) 6
（二）英國保釋制度的基本內(nèi)容 8
1.保釋的適用范圍 8
2.保釋的保證形式 8
3.保釋的決定主體 9
4.違反保釋規(guī)定的法律責(zé)任 9
5.保釋的救濟(jì)程序 10
（三）英國保釋制度的理論基礎(chǔ) 10
1.自由理念 10
2.無罪推定 11
三、取保候?qū)徟c保釋制度的比較 12
（一）取保候?qū)徟c保釋制度的相似之處 12
（二）取保候?qū)徟c保釋制度的不同之處 12
四、借鑒保釋制度，完善取保候?qū)?15
（一）取保候?qū)徃母锏暮暧^思考 15
（二）取保候?qū)徃母锏奈⒂^思考 16
1.適用范圍方面 16
2.保證形式方面 16
3.決定權(quán)方面 17
4.制裁舉措方面 17
5.救濟(jì)程序方面 18
結(jié) 論 19
參考文獻(xiàn) 20
致 謝 21
參考文獻(xiàn)
[1]徐靜村.刑事訴訟法學(xué)（第三版）（上）[M].北京：法律出版社，2008.
[2]林兆波，王硯圖.取保候?qū)徶贫却嬖诘娜毕莺统雎穂A].見陳衛(wèi)東.保釋制度與取保[M].北京:中國檢察出版社，2009.
[3]林苗.權(quán)力腐敗與權(quán)力制約[M].北京：法律出版社，1998.
[4]邱小梅.有關(guān)保釋制度的一點思考[D].載于陳衛(wèi)東.保釋制度與取保候?qū)?北京：中國檢察出版社，2003.
[5]任寰.關(guān)于在我國刑事訴訟中建立司法審查制度的構(gòu)想[J].法學(xué)，2003(5).
[6]李佑安,安永勇.取保候?qū)徟c保釋制度比較研究[J].載于陳衛(wèi)東.保釋制度與取保候?qū)?北京：中國檢察出版社，2003.
[7]栗克元.刑事訴訟法學(xué)[M].河南：鄭州大學(xué)出版社，2004.
[8]陳衛(wèi)東.保釋制度與取保候?qū)廩M].北京：中國檢察出版社，2003.
[9]張建良.刑事強制措施要論[M].北京：中國人民公安大學(xué)，2005.
[10]陳光中.外國刑事訴訟程序比較研究[M].北京：法律出版社，1988.
[11][英]L•B•科爾森.朗文法律詞典[M].（英文版）.北京：法律出版社，2003.
[12][英]P•H•科林.英漢雙解法律詞典[M].（英文版）.世界圖書出版公司，1998.
[13]周振想.論金錢保釋制度[J].中外法學(xué)，1994(3).
[14]徐靜村,潘金貴.論英國保釋制度及其借鑒意義[J].政治與法律，2004(1).
[15]房國賓,邱俊芳,齊玥.兩大法系保釋制度比較研究及我國保釋制度的立法和構(gòu)建[J].法學(xué)研究(甘肅社會科學(xué))，2005(4).
